Jeff Pearlman

  • Twitter Icon
  • Twitter Icon
  • Twitter Icon

Category Archives: Uncategorized

Do something (I did)

The sign can finally go in the garage

The sign can finally go in the garage

About 3 1/2 years ago I placed a call to Noam Bramson, the longtime mayor of New Rochelle, N.Y. and a Pearlman family friend.

We had recently relocated from The Queen City of the Sound (New Ro’s nickname) to Southern California, and I wanted some advice on how to possibly make a political impact on our new home turf. Unlike New Rochelle, as well as most of the other places I’d lived, my new town leaned hard to the right. The city council was Republican. The mayor was Republican. And, worst of all, our congressman was an entrenched arch-conservative political animal named Dana Rohrabacher, who seemed both eccentric and uncompromising.

Noam and I didn’t come up with any concrete solutions that day, but I committed myself to somehow, some way getting involved.

Shortly thereafter, Crazy Dana was born.

For those who don’t know, Crazy Dana is a website I started, with the double intent of informing people of Rohrabacher’s nuttiness and spearheading a movement to ultimately end his political career. I didn’t really know what I was doing, so I just began blogging, blogging, blogging. Then, when the race sorta commenced, I sat down with the myriad candidates, conducted Q&As, offered analysis. I attended some debates, chronicled the highs and lows, sought out political insiders for insights and understandings. I became increasingly comfortable with the material, and as time passed more people started to recognize me as “Crazy Dana” (Having lived for two decades as “The Rocker Guy,” it was a nice switch). I was quoted in articles, requested for radio spots. I was told, with legitimate frequency, that the site was informing lots of people. That knowledge was being spread. I showed my sister that post you wrote and I made copies of that thing you shared. On and on and on.

Bramson: An impact from 3,000 miles away

Bramson: An impact from 3,000 miles away

I bring this up because earlier tonight, the Associated Press officially determined that Dana Rohrabacher—congressman for three decades—had lost to a Democratic businessman and first-time candidate named Harley Rouda. I was sitting in my car when I heard the news, and felt like crying. Truly, I was overcome by the varied emotions.

And here’s the thing: My website is not the reason for outcome of this race. Rouda ran a wise campaign, Rohrabacher ran a shitty campaign, Rouda is serious and sane, Rohrabacher is a space cadet. One candidate was amazing and the other was shit—and it showed itself in the results.

However, if there’s a lesson from Crazy Dana, make it this: You can get involved. You can make a difference. It doesn’t only have to be via giving money, or marching in the streets. There are all sorts of creative ways to make your impact felt, especially in this funky Internet era of social media madness.

So … 2020 is approaching on the quick. You live somewhere with politicians who turn your stomach. Starting a website costs $0.00.

Get up.

Get going.

Do it.

A reminder about Russia and the conman

Screen Shot 2018-11-09 at 11.35.46 PM

I’ve brought this up before, but it seems important tonight. So, a reminder …

After the end of the USFL’s inaugural season in 1983, Donald Trump purchased the New Jersey Generals from an Oklahoman oil guru named Walter Duncan. In the leadup to that sale, Trump praised the USFL as this great spring football league that he absolutely loved. Then, as soon as the Generals became his property, he started insisting the league needed to move to fall to directly battle the NFL.

Then, he arranged a secret meeting with Pete Rozelle, commissioner of the NFL.

He told no one.

Literally, no one.

He paid for a suite at the Pierre Hotel in Manhattan, and invited Rozelle for a talk. Once the two were in the same room, Trump told Rozelle—with no ambiguity—that he would throw the USFL under the bus in exchange for an NFL franchise. To be clear, Donald Trump, WHO OWNED A USFL TEAM, SAID HE WOULD HAPPILY HAVE THE USFL DIE IF IT MEANT GETTING HIM IN THE NFL.

Read that once.


Three times.

So don’t tell me he’s an honorable man.

Don’t tell me he wouldn’t collude with Russia.

Don’t tell me.

Oh, and later on he lied under oath about the entire thing.

Because that’s what he does.

9.94 cents a word, and worth every cent

Screen Shot 2018-11-08 at 11.03.33 AM

I’ve been off the feature writing grid of late, but today The Athletic kindly ran a piece I pitched, then cobbled together, about Kyle Brandt, the Good Morning Football co-host and one of the absolute best people in sports media.

This is the link.

So this one … well, interesting backstory.

I’ve known Kyle for about a decade, ever since I started doing these occasional week-long guest appearances on Jim Rome’s old CBS Sports Network TV show. Kyle was the producer back then. He’d greet you at the studio, talk shop, etc. Wonderful guy. Very inquisitive. And it was only after a couple of years that I learned he had A. Been a pretty damn good halfback at Princeton; B. Starred in the 2001 season of The Real World and C. Was a former Days of Our Lives stud. Not that we discussed those things all that much. But it made an interesting fellow all the more interesting, and as his career exploded and he became an NFL Network morning show co-host, I thought, “Man, this is a profile waiting to be written.”

Only pieces on sports TV folks are surprisingly hard to land.

In my 20-something years in the business, I think I’ve only profiled one sports television personality, and that was Howie Long for a long-defunct magazine, Best Life. However, I desperately wanted to write this. So I pitched it around, pitched it around. And, at long last, the good folk at The Athletic said I could write it. For (glub) the veteran’s minimum of $500.

The final submitted word count was 5,027. If you do the math …

Screen Shot 2018-11-08 at 11.11.30 AM

… I made 9.94 cents-per-word to write this. By comparison, back when magazines were rolling, I’d get between $1.50-and-$3-per word for an assignment. Granted, that was at a time when print was strong and budgets were beefy. But, eh, 9.94 cents is not very good.

And yet, I’m not mad. Or even slightly mad. Or even slightly slightly slightly mad. This is a story I desperately wanted to piece together, and The Athletic gave me that opportunity—even though they weren’t overly jazzed about profiling a TV guy. I actually get it. The site runs 100 percent of off subscriptions. It needs pieces that will draw in readers. Big names. Big teams. Maybe a television guy—even with an amazing narrative—doesn’t meet that criterion. I’m just fortunate, in that my book career has afforded me the luxury of taking on occasional side projects that are more about pleasure than pocket money.

Anyhow, I’m very proud of this piece.

And equally happy to know Kyle Brandt.

Screen Shot 2018-11-06 at 1.01.49 AM

David Aldridge

Screen Shot 2018-11-06 at 1.01.49 AM

David Aldridge is not “D.A.”

Yeah, that’s perhaps how you know him, based off of myriad years of NBA television work and hearing the studio hosts “sending it down to D.A.”

But, truth be told, the brand new editor in chief of The Athletic D.C. is a man of the written word. He cut his teeth at the Washington Post and Philadelphia Inquirer, covering the very awful Bullets, the equally awful Redskins, the exciting Georgetown Hoyas—and myriad other events and moments. He’s not merely a student of sports, but a student of monitoring sports. How to approach an athlete. What to look for in a coach-star interaction. When has a team given up. When is a player faded.

In short, he’s one of the absolute best.

That’s why, for the 379th Quaz Q&A, David Aldridge joins us to explain the new gig; to talk Ralph Sampson’s Washington Bullets and why #fakenews drives him to the bring of furor.

One can follow David on Twitter here.

David Aldridge, you are the Quaz …

JEFF PEARLMAN: I’m gonna start with a broader question than usual. Hope that’s OK. So you’ve covered a ton of sporting events for major outlets. The Washington Post. ESPN. TNT. The Philadelphia Inquirer. And I feel like, in our business, most of the events we attend fade to murkiness. So what’s an unexpected one that hasn’t? What I mean is—I know World Series and NBA Finals and such are big, because they’re big. But what’s something you’ve covered that really stuck with you? And why?

DAVID ALDRIDGE: I’m not sure I’m weaseling out of your question, because one story I’ve always remembered was at a big event—the Indianapolis 500, in 1988. But the story was about someone not all that famous: the late driver/racer Jim Crawford. The year before, Crawford had been in a terrible accident at Indy during practice—he crashed into a wall, and the resulting impact badly injured both his legs and feet. He had rods in his ankle and they had to jerry-rig a way for him to drive the car the following year to lessen the impact on his feet. He was still using a cane. But he got back in the car to race.

I asked him before the race how someone can do that without giving in to fear. I don’t recall his exact words, but they fell along the lines of “This is what I do for a living.” And it was startling to me that he was so matter of fact about potential serious injury and/or dying. But it made me realize that there’s a huge difference between what civilians like me think about sports and what professional athletes think about them. They understand the risks involved but they believe that their talent and/or experience mitigates those risks to the point of absurdity. As it turned out, Crawford not only raced again in 1988, he led the race for a bunch of laps and was second late before a blown tire dropped him to sixth. It was still an incredible run, especially considering he was the only Buick driver going against the legendary Roger Penske team (and, in the end, Rick Mears won his third of four Indys that year). Incredible. I may or may not have been rooting that day—for the story, to be sure. But also for the guy.

J.P.: Sorta random, but I feel like we in sports media have largely escaped the #fakenews drama. No one hashtags #fakenews about whether Tyrod Taylor should start at quarterback, or whether the Sixers need help at shooting guard. But, man, it still really wounds me, pisses me off. And I wonder A. How you feel about it; and B. What impact you think it’s had on our industry?

D.A.: I don’t believe there’s a journalist of any bent who hasn’t been impacted by the #fakenews insanity. I’m sure if you interviewed writers who cover college sports and teams, they’d have a much different tale to tell you than someone like me who’d been national for a long time. A story like Maryland’s here in the D.C. area is rife for that kind of “My side is the only side” takes by readers. There are people who staunchly defended, and continue to defend, D.J. Durkin. When it involves the alma mater, people don’t always think clearly.

Of course, generally, as a journalist, I’m offended by the notion that “reporting about things I don’t like or don’t want to hear that could impact my worldview=fake news.” But, I live in D.C. I am about 10 minutes from Comet Pizza, which is where the whole “Hillary Clinton is running a child prostitution ring out of the basement of a pizzeria in D.C.” idiocy was supposedly located, and where the guy from North Carolina drove up to, and came in with a gun. And I have friends on that same block who either own or run businesses who’ve received death threats. They aren’t in any way affiliated with Comet—which, again, was not at the location of this (non-existent) child prostitution ring—but they still got death threats, just because they were on the same block. That’s how insane this has become.

I don’t worry about big institutions like CNN or The Washington Post; they’ll be fine. They have strong, long-lasting followings and followers—and, more important, they have access to high-powered lawyers and law firms. What worries me is the small, independently-owned paper in Michigan or Arkansas or New Mexico that tries to speak truth to power, no matter what the power is in that particular place, and is harassed by people for political reasons. Those institutions don’t have the financial wherewithal to survive an economic boycott. And so, what happens? You stop covering the city council. You stop covering the mayor’s office, or the cops–or, at least, you stop covering them as aggressively. And people who live in those places don’t find out how the deputy mayor is using the city coffers as his or her personal ATM, or whatever. The chilling effect is real.

Screen Shot 2018-11-06 at 1.02.35 AM

J.P.: You covered the 1991-92 Washington Bullets for the Washington Post. They finished 25-57, and their roster featured the likes of Ledell Eackles, Tom Hammonds and a battered and feeble Ralph Sampson. What is it like covering a crappy team, night after night? Is there joy in it? Is it a nightmare? Is there a way to find fresh copy when it’s lose-lose-lose-lose?

D.A.: I learned so much more covering bad teams than good ones. (I was the kiss of death as a beat guy. Covered the Bullets—they were the Bullets then—for five years, and their “high-water” mark with me was 40-42. Then covered the Skins for three years, and they went 3-13, 4-12, 6-10.) But you learn so much about people in those times: who is a stand-up guy in the locker room, and who goes and hides.

So, guys like Darrell Walker and Jeff Malone, who talked to me every night, loss after loss, were and are some of my favorite people ever in this business. What coaches tell you the truth, even when it’s against their self-interest, and which ones don’t. And, you have to grow as a writer. The 17th time in 23 days you have to write a variation on “This team sucks,” it’s hard. One time, in Atlanta, I remember just throwing my hands up. The Bullets were losing by a hundred in the first quarter, as usual. And this was when Ted Turner still owned CNN, so he came to the game with his then-wife, Jane Fonda. And I wrote a lede about how gorgeous and hot Jane Fonda looked (she did), and how striking Ted Turner looked (this was, for your conspiracy-minded readers, about 15 years before I started working for Turner Sports—which, by then, Ted Turner no longer owned). And my editor spiked it. And I said something along the lines of, ‘well, you come down here and cover this shitty team, then.’ I think that may have been my last year on the beat.

J.P.: You are a recognizable sports media figure. Players call you “D.A.,” coaches call you “D.A.” They know your face, they know your name, they wish you well. And maybe this sounds dumb, but was that level of fame ever enticing or overwhelming? Like, is it sort of an aphrodisiac to have famous, rich, recognizable heroes acknowledge and embrace you? Or is that just dumb?

D.A.: Nota Bene: I hate “D.A.” It’s a totally, made-up, TV thing. But, since it’s short and to the point, I live with it.

I never bought into the fame part of being on TV. And that’s not because I’m extra-crispy virtuous or anything. It’s just that I grew up when newspapers were the most important thing, and I wanted to work for one, and almost nobody I knew at the time who worked for a paper was famous. (I worked in the same building with Bob Woodward, at the Post. We were not, in any way, colleagues. I saw him at a National Press Club event last year, and said “Hi, Bob.” He looked at me like I was a crustacean. I guess the nine years together didn’t produce strong memories for him.) I think, also, I saw how other people acted around famous people and just found it repulsive. If you’ve ever been in a bar or a club with Michael Jordan, you see some of the weirdest things. People lose their damn minds. So fame was never a thing I sought. It was weird for me to try and use my name to get a reservation at a restaurant. Really. If I was 25 now, I might think differently about it. I don’t know. I’m a pretty shy person so the idea of everyone knowing you never appealed to me.

Screen Shot 2018-11-06 at 1.03.17 AM

J.P.: You recently accepted a position as editor in chief of The Athletic D.C. A. Mazel tov. B. Why?

D.A.: Everything pointed to the same thing: you have to take this job. I loved working at Turner. It’s the best place I ever worked. The people were terrific, from top to bottom. They treated you great, and they paid you well. Being on set with Chuck and Kenny and EJ and Shaq was always a kick, but so was doing NBA TV with Matt Winer or Casey Stern or Kristen Ledlow. The travel was just starting to kick my butt. You don’t bounce back as quickly as you used to. Our kids are 14 and 11, and my dad is 90 and still lives here. I wanted to maximize my remaining time with each of them, for obvious reasons.

And, the opportunity to work with a new company that really is thinking differently about covering sports, in my hometown, was so enticing. I just knew I’d hate myself if I didn’t make the jump. I could have covered the NBA exclusively forever. I love the games and (most) of the people. But I also wanted to try and stretch and grow, not just as a writer, but as an editor, working with both experienced and young reporters. I really want to help people get better in our business. This was a great chance to try and do that. I just am in love with words. Always have been, and always will be.

J.P.: When you and I were coming up in the business, there was a path. You started at the Post, I started at the Tennessean. We moved to bigger places, sort of this logically linear progression. And nowadays, I’m not always sure what to tell aspiring journalists about entering the field. What to do; whether to do it; etc. What says David Aldridge?

D.A.: The great thing about being an emerging journalist today is there is no path. You don’t have to do that small paper to regional paper to big paper trek. You don’t have to do “paper” at all, of course. The Internet has democratized the world, and while that has serious and significant drawbacks (see “fake news,” above), it also makes it so much easier for young reporters trying to break in. A cell and a laptop, and you’re a content producer. Monetizing that is obviously the nut, but you can at least produce real content that you would not have been able to when we started. There are no gate-keeping media any more. It’s scary, I’m sure. But it also means the truly creative and hard-working young reporters can be seen a lot quicker by a lot more people, potentially by both consumers and employers.

Screen Shot 2018-11-06 at 1.03.39 AM

J.P.: You’ve covered sports for a long time. How does it still hold your interest? (I ask because I struggle with this all the time)

D.A.: I’m not going to lie—I wasn’t thrilled by every game every Thursday on Turner during the last 14 years. But the amazing thing about sports is you still, more often than not, see someone do something you can’t fathom. Sunday, I was at the Skins-Giants game. And it was a terrible game. But Odell Beckham made the most amazing, one-handed catch in the fourth quarter. Just a ridiculous display of athletic ability. Literally—”did he CATCH that??” So the win-loss part of it has lost a little steam for me (which is another reason I joined The Athletic, which is all about telling stories, not about the agate). But you still, frequently, see people do things that boggle the mind.

J.P.: You’ve covered the NFL at both the Post and the Inquirer. I always thought the league was far more difficult to chronicle than the NBA, just because the access sucks and their faces are behind masks. What about you? NBA v. NFL as a writer?

D.A.: Completely different sports and mindsets. It’s harder to cover football for numerous reasons. The intricacies of the game are almost unknowable to non-players, and even harder to explain. We have a guy at The Athletic D.C., Mark Bullock, who breaks down film every week to tell our readers exactly what happened on a given play. And it’s remarkable how many different concepts and ideas go into every play. Trying to explain that is extremely difficult. Determining exactly who was supposed to block who on a given play is almost impossible—because guys don’t want to sell each other out: “Well, Troy fucked up his assignment; that’s why the QB got blindsided.” That sort of thing. The access is awful, always has been.

But the access in the NBA isn’t a whole lot better these days. Yes, LeBron speaks most every day after practice, but almost always in a scrum and never for more than a few minutes. It was almost impossible for us to get him to do a sit-down at Turner, and we were a partner ($24 billion, along with ESPN)! And this isn’t personal: LeBron and I had a good relationship. But it’s reality. Having said all that, the NBA is still so much easier to cover, simply because, even though every team has kicked almost all of the media upstairs, you still are so much more closer to the action than you are covering the NFL. And, there are only 12 guys as opposed to 53 on every team. It’s so much easier to establish relationship with pro ballers than football players; there are a third as many. Plus, there’s still a top-down approach in the NFL that doesn’t exist in the NBA, so coaches and front offices have all the juice. As the late Chuck Daly said, in the NBA, players allow you to coach them. Players run the show in the NBA, and they’re finally starting to see the power they really have—again, thanks in large part to LeBron.


J.P.: I just Googled “David Aldridge sucks,” and I found someone who wrote, bluntly, “David Aldridge sucks monkey nuts.” I’m assuming this is not literally true. But I wonder, how do you feel about the world of social media as it pertains to media? Do you like the engagement? Hate it? Has it changed the way we, as a profession, operate?

D.A.: I wouldn’t say I hate it. I don’t think it’s especially healthy. The anonymity of Twitter makes it incredibly toxic. You can literally write ‘the sky is blue’ and have some egg respond “Fuck you.” And we’ve all seen how influencers like Twitter and Facebook can easily be manipulated for nefarious ends. Yet there are still people who are truly thoughtful and genuinely are seeking dialogue and/or feedback, and you can learn a lot if you’re willing to be humble and accept constructive criticism. It has certainly freed athletes to speak their minds more, and that’s obviously a good thing (as I see it). You have to report via Twitter most of the time now, though, and it is not designed for that purpose. But it’s how young consumers consume and communicate. So you have to as well.

J.P.: Here’s your random question of the date: I thought David Wingate was going to be an NBA star. I truly, truly, truly did. You covered Georgetown (after he was there, albeit), you covered the Bullets when he was there. What the heck happened?

D.A.: David didn’t make it ’cause he couldn’t shoot. Point blank. He could defend and he was a willing passer, but he couldn’t shoot. Even back then, in the Fred Flintstone era of the NBA, you had to be able to shoot a little, and especially if you were a two (shooting) guard. But David was a cool guy. Liked working/talking with him.

Screen Shot 2018-11-06 at 1.04.57 AM


• Rank in order (favorite to least): A.J. English, Tashan Reed, Dave Wohl, Beyonce, Naomi Watts, Luke Walton, Robert Mueller, Toni Braxton, “The Princess Bride,” the musical catalogue of Hall & Oates, the number 17: 1) The Hall and Oates musical catalogue. I happen to think ‘Kiss on My List’ is a damn near perfect song. I am also in love with Liz Clarke, who works at the Washington Post and with whom I do Tony Kornheiser’s podcast. And, as you probably know, Liz is one of the biggest Springsteen fans out there. She’s seen him hundreds of times over the years. And she loathes H and O! Thinks they’re a treacly, unthoughtful, awful group, especially compared with Bruce, not that she would ever compare them, as much as she holds H and o in contempt. And I love that we fight about this, as (imaginary) couples often do about music. 2) Robert Mueller. I happen to think this country is worth saving. Even now. 3) Beyonce. ‘Cause, of course. Summer of ’04, when “Crazy For Love” came out, I was covering the NBA Summer League in Boston. And everybody was listening to it, it seemed. She’s incredible. I remember when she sang for Obama at his second inauguration, I think it was. I sent out a Tweet saying ‘it’s so sad how God didn’t bless Beyonce with incredible talent, or looks, or work ethic.’ And it showed me how Twitter is NOT the place for sarcasm. 4) The Princess Bride. “Have fun storming the castle!” 5) Toni Braxton. Just downloaded her latest album. Toni’s pissed! 6) A.J. English. I assume you mean the father and not the son. If the former, nice kid out of Virginia Union. Had some talent. He could have probably played in the league today; he could shoot. His claim to fame was that one night, somehow, the trainer or whoever put the players’ names on their jerseys misspelled his name. It read E-N-G-I-L-S-H on the back. 7) Luke Walton. A go-to talker as a player. A little more reserved as a coach, as you’d expect. But has that smooth, sonorous voice. Like opening up a can of Barry White. 8) The number 17. I associate this wholly with Billy Kilmer, the quarterback in the ’70s in D.C.. Couldn’t throw the ball more than 20 yards, or run more than 20 yards, it seemed. But a hell of a leader. They called him ‘Whiskey’ for a reason, I reckon. 9) Tashan Reed. Kid wrote a great lede last week on the Clemson-Florida State game, on the professor who was at the game and was so bored—FSU got beat 52-10 or something—he went to the top of the stands, took his shirt off and started reading a book. Tashan walked up there and talked to him. Great idea. 10) Dave Wohl. Just never got to know Dave very well. Nothing personal.  11) Naomi Watts. Nothing personal; I just am not all that familiar with her oeuvre. I had to look her up on iMDb, and the only thing I think I’ve ever seen that she was in was “Fair Game,” and I only saw about a third of that.

• In exactly 16 words, make a case for the Hall of Fame credential of Morlon Wiley: Morlon has become a hell of a personal trainer for guys going into the draft. Done.

• Three memories from your first date: 1) Her name was Carol. 2) I took her to a dance party at someone’s house, whose name I can’t remember. 3) I was driving my dad’s car—a ’77 Cadillac Coupe de Ville—and I spun out on the way. I can’t remember if the road was slick with ice or rain. But we did a 360—a complete loop around—and wound up exactly where we started. How no one hit me remains one of the mysteries guarding my life.

• Who wins in a game of one-on-one—right now—between you and John Mengelt? Game to 15, what’s the final score?: Okay, John is still alive. I checked, and trust you did as well. But he is 69. But he was a former professional basketball player. So, this comes down to shape. If he’s anywhere near his playing weight, he beats me 15-2 or something like that. If he’s three bills or more now, I have a shot at squeaking out a 15-13 deal. If it’s halfcourt.

• What’s the worst sports prediction you ever made?: Didn’t see how Greg Oden could miss as a pro.

• The kid across the street is screaming obnoxiously right now. Do I have your permission to berate him through the window?: Of course. Soggy little brat.

• Five friendliest professional athletes you’ve ever dealt with: In no particular order: Peyton Manning. I know it’s likely an act, but when I was covering football, and this was after ESPN, so maybe he knew who I was, he had mastered that player’s art of greeting me by name when we were re-introduced and working my name into his answers: “well, Dave, you know, I thought they were in Cover Two, so what we had to do there was,” and of course, I fell for it every time, like a dummy. Darrell Walker. Like I said above, I would go to him every night when I covered the Bullets, whether they’d were on a rare winning streak and he’d played well, or they were on a 16-game losing streak and he’d been awful, and he’d have the same greeting every time: “what’s up, Aldridge?” You love guys like that. Brian Dawkins. Hell of a good dude to cover in Philly. Always accessible and available. (I was in Dallas a lot when the Cowboys were rolling in the ’90s as well, and I’d say the same about Darren Woodson.) Steve Kerr. Good God, we abused him in Chicago. Every day, especially when Michael and/or Scottie Pippen weren’t talking. But Steve was the same in Orlando and Cleveland as he was in Chicago. He never blew us off, ever. He’s still great to talk to. Incredibly thoughtful. And, after thinking about it, I do have a number one: Charles Barkley. The Chuckster was gold. The most down to earth superstar I’ve ever dealt with, both as a beat reporter at the beginning of my career in D.C., to the last 14 years working together at Turner. When he was in Philly, my buddy Bob Ford was the beat guy for the Inquirer. And Bob would get the most pained look on his face when the out-of-town guys like me would goad Charles into saying something inflammatory, because we’d skip out of town with a great item for our notebook or whatever, and Bob would have to clean up the mess the next day. I have been with Charles in so many restaurants and bars and clubs over the years. Dozens of dozens. And, every time—every time, I’m not exaggerating—he picks up the tab. Not for me. For everyone. Every night. Night after night. He doesn’t big-time anyone. I was there in Barcelona in ’92, when he out on the Ramblas after a game, and he gave a homeless woman a wad of bills–had to be 10 grand–out of his pocket.

• What do your shoes smell like after a long day at work?: Are they supposed to smell like something other than feet? It would alarm me if they smelled like, say, fried eggs.

• What’s your all-time favorite restaurant?: Probably Prima Piatti. Closed a while ago. Used to take the wife there for dinner before she became the wife. Lovely place in Northwest D.C.

• Tell us a joke, please: I can show you better than I can tell you (h/t The Edge comedy show, circa 1992):

Thoughts for a youth pastor

Screen Shot 2018-11-06 at 3.29.13 PM

Earlier today I engaged in some Twitter back and forth with Stephen Gilbreath, the youth pastor at the Harmony Baptist Church in LaFayette, Georgia. And, to be clear, I have no reason to think Stephen isn’t a sincere lover of Jesus and his teachings. But as I read up on Stephen, I was made aware that he’s a supporter of Donald Trump—despite Tweeting, “When I vote, I could care less about skin color, gender, etc. I care about your values, ethics, etc.”

I feel the need to address this. Really, to call some major BS not just on Stephen, but on all the Christians who have appeared to set aside their moral compasses to back a president who has displayed—bluntly, clearly—no moral compass.

I actually don’t get it. I mean, I get not voting for Democrats because your beliefs lean conservative. And I certainly get being anti-abortion, and therefore wanting Roe v. Wade to be overturned.

God: Not a big MAGA dude.

God: Not a big MAGA dude.

But I do believe nothing in America has done greater injury to Christianity (and devotion to its myriad churches) than pastors and ministers and preachers and clergy of myriad sort throwing their lot behind a man who boasted—openly—of grabbing women by “the pussy.” Of a man who regularly refused to pay blue-collar contractors for their work, then sued if they dare challenge. Of a man who created a fake “university” to bilk people of their money. Of a man who called for the death penalty for the Central Park 5 after they were deemed innocent. Of a man who insisted—for four years—that the sitting president of the United States was a Kenyan-born Muslim and that he had “people on the ground” finding “amazing things.” Of a man who refused to rent apartments to blacks in Queens, N.Y. Of a man who openly mocked John McCain for “being captured” and ridiculed a Gold Star Family for “phony” tears. Of a man who cheated on his just-delivered-a-baby third wife with a porn star, then paid said porn star money to stay quiet. Of a man who lied about the intent and scale of asylum seekers walking through Central America, then utilized those lies to deploy 15,000 active troops to the border for political reasons. Of a man who cheated on his first wife, his second wife and his third wife. Of a man who lied under oath during the USFL-NFL trial. Of a man who kicked homeless Vietnam veterans off the block in front of Trump Tower because they made it “look disgusting.” Of a man who donated $0.00 to 9.11 causes in his own city—and lied about it. Of a man who lied about going to Ground Zero to help with the rescue efforts. Of a man who lied about seeing Muslims celebrating atop a rooftop as the buildings fell. Of a man who has deliberately undermined the FBI, the CIA, voting commissions—because he could. Of a man who was pro-choice until he decided being pro-life would get more votes. Of a man who mocked Ted Cruz’s wife for her looks and said Ted Cruz’s dad was involved in the JFK assassination.

Stephen—rightly—re-Tweeted about the awfulness of Redskins fans mocking a teenager with autism. Yet he backs a president who has mocked the disabled, Mexicans, Muslims, unattractive women, Jews … on and on.

I could keep going with this list.

Truly I could.

But that’s not the point. In this country, there is a place for faith. A value to it. But when you preach goodness and kindness and decency, then throw your weight behind a man who spits in the face of virtue, well, you are asking people to believe without giving them something to believe in.

You are asking them to live in a Christ-like way—when it’s not being implemented.

PS: One of my all-time favorite quotations is “Youth is wasted on the young”—initially stated by George Bernard Shaw. And I think it’s true. And I do believe sometimes young folks haven’t lived long enough yet to truly grasp the intricacies of things. That was certainly me as a young journalist. So I hold out hope that, down the line, a guy like Stephen can recognize a false messiah-type figure when he/she comes along. Because, again, the damage Donald Trump is doing to faith in America is enormous. I just don’t believe the people deeply invested are seeing it. Yet.

Don’t presume.

Screen Shot 2018-11-06 at 11.40.42 AM

Never presume.

Never …

Ever …

Ever …

Ever …


It’s a good guiding principle. Because presumptions aren’t facts. And while facts can’t be broken, presumptions dissolve and tear like paper in water.

Case in point: Yesterday I wrote the above Tweet, which I stand by 100 percent. There’s just a long, ugly history of white college football coaches swooping up poor African-American high school athletes, bringing them to their plantations campuses, using them for running and catching and throwing, providing a subpar education, then spitting them out. Hell, read Willie Morris’ brilliant “The Courting of Marcus Dupree.” Or even my book, “Sweetness.” It’s a well-worn saga.

So, in defending my Tweet from overzealous Georgia and Florida State fans, I ducked and bobbed and jabbed and hooked. And, in regards to a woman who identifies as @Pupwalker1, I presumed. Here was a piece of the exchange …

Screen Shot 2018-11-06 at 11.37.43 AM

And here was her reply …

Screen Shot 2018-11-06 at 11.31.34 AM

Or, put differently …

The point is—assuming and presuming … bad policy. We could have had a dialogue without my jumping to conclusions about her family.

So, @Pupwalker1, I apologize.


Wrightsville and Herschel

Screen Shot 2018-11-05 at 3.54.22 PM

On March 2, 1948, the grand dragon of the Georgia Ku Klux Klan issued a decree to the black inhabitants of Wrightsville, a smallish city of approximately 1,300 residents in Johnson County: Should they exercise their right to vote in an upcoming election, “blood will flow.”

Read an Associated Press from the following morning: “About 400 Negroes are eligible to join 5,200 white persons in Wednesday’s voting in which nomination is tantamount to election in this democratic stronghold of the deep south. Negroes stayed away from the voting booths Wednesday. Officials said 241 Negroes were eligible to vote at pilling places at the county courthouse. None had appeared two hours after polls opened.”

Herschel Walker, the future University of Georgia and professional football star, was 16 years from birth when this occurred. However, his parents—Willis and Christine Walker—were living in town. So were their parents. And, I believe, their parents. They were all there when the KKK did everything it could to suppress black inhabitants from voting. And while I can’t speak for the Walkers, I have to guess they were some mixture of intimidated, scared and horrified. What other reaction would there be to living in a country that works to make sure you can’t have a vote?

I bring this up because it was brought to my attention that Herschel Walker, long retired from the game but still an iconic figure in Georgia, is endorsing Brian Kemp to be the state’s governor.

And I am speechless.

In case you haven’t been paying attention, Kemp—Georgia’s secretary of state—has been giving his all to the voter suppression movement. That’s not hyperbole. That’s not slant. Read here, if you choose. Or here. Or here. Or here. Right now there are two men leading the far-right charge to keep African-Americans and other minorities from casting ballots tomorrow. One is the sinister Kris Kobach of Kansas. The other is Kemp.

There’s actually no debate on this. You won’t hear the GOP arguing that Kemp and Kobach aren’t targeting largely minority-populated areas. No, you’ll just hear the lamest of lame excuses. It’s a budget thing. It’s overkill. Voter fraud needs to be stopped. On and on. But … untrue? No. You won’t get that.

Which leads me back to Walker. Late last night I lambasted Herschel on social media for supporting Kemp. Some took umbrage with that—What the fuck do you know? What are you trying to say? Are you saying Herschel Walker is misinformed? Misguided? Dumb?

Well, yeah. I am.

Coming from where he comes from, knowing what his family experienced, it makes absolutely no sense to support the man who supporters voter blockage. It’s be akin to me—the Jewish product of Holocaust victims—backing the alt-right movement.

So, yes. I think Herschel Walker is dumb.

Or maybe just insane.

A letter to the people

Screen Shot 2018-11-03 at 11.37.43 AM

Dear Friend/Neighbor:

Though it may well come as a surprise, I’ve never written a letter like this before. Yes, I’m politically active and politically opinionated, but I’m not one to directly urge people how to vote on Election Day. It’s a private decision process—one I very much respect (whether we share beliefs or not).

That said, today I am making an exception. And I ask you to please give me a minute.

Over the past year I have paid extremely close attention to our congressional race here in the 48th, which pits a 30-year incumbent, Dana Rohrabacher, against Harley Rouda, a political newcomer and lifelong businessman. I’ve attended debates, I’ve read and read and read, I’ve chronicled the race.

And I am urging you … no, begging you—to vote for Harley Rouda.

To be clear, this isn’t your standard Democrat vs. Republican issue, or liberal vs. conservative issue. This isn’t about experience vs. inexperience, or Build a Wall vs. Don’t Build a Wall. I know many (most?) here are far more conservative than I’ll ever be. And I swear, this is not about that.

Nope—this is 100 percent about righteousness.

Over the past year, I have watched Rohrabacher associate with Nazi sympathizers and alt-right adherents with jarring comfort and regularity. I was at a rally in Huntington Beach where he appeared (unapologetically) alongside marchers walking with Nazi flags. I was shocked (truly shocked) when I read about Rohrabacher bringing infamous conspiracy theorist Charles C. Johnson (He argues that the Auschwitz gas chambers were not real, and the number of Jews killed by Nazi Germany was 250,000, not 6 million) as his guest to a meeting with Senator Rand Paul. I can go on and on about Rohrabacher’s lunatic ties to the alt-right—and, as the great grandson of a woman who was gassed in Auschwitz, I feel compelled to.

I knew little-to-nothing about Dana Rohrabacher when we moved here four years ago. But I’ve never seen someone this vile and unworthy hold a political position for so long. I can only explain it away via the power of incumbency and, sadly, general voter indifference.

Well, I am asking you a favor. Please do not vote for Dana Rohrabacher on Tuesday. I don’t care what else you do with your ballot. It’s none of my business. But this man has represented us long enough.

He’s more than an embarrassment.

He’s a disgrace.

Thanks for your time. I appreciate it, and I won’t bother you again on this issue.


Screen Shot 2018-11-03 at 12.07.53 PM






PS: It’s no exaggeration to say I’ve thought long and hard about my grandparents (My Grandma Marta could never speak of leaving Germany and her mother’s death without crying) during this process, and what they would want me to do. Hence, the letter.



Tim Donnelly is a ho

Joe Connelly (right): Just so damn sexy.

Tim Donnelly (right): Just so damn sexy.

So, before I dig into this post, I’d like to take a moment and explain the title.

First, I don’t believe in calling anyone a “ho” 99.9 percent of the time. It’s vile, it’s wrongheaded, it’s sexist, it’s gross. I wouldn’t do it, and I would be furious if my kids did it.

So why is the headline of this post TIM DONNELLY IS A HO?

Well, because I thought to myself, “What’s the best way to piss off an immature asshole with an IQ of 12?” I mean, he’s a wanna-be tough guy who walks with a fake strut and carries nonsense credentials. He’s intellectually weightless, professionally unaccomplished, ignored by Donald Trump even though he’s an arch-conservative Republican. I’m sure, through the years, he’s been labeled all sorts of things, most of which he takes with pride. What I mean is, when guys like Tim Donnelly are called dumb, they’ll say, “The elite liberal media is once again looking down on us …” blah blah blah. And when guys like Tim Donnelly are called assholes, they fire back with some machismo-laced tough talk that goes over beautifully at the ol’ Elk’s Club with Roy and Tim and the other plaid-wearing, gun-toting, sexually conflicted characters who slug beers and bash “queers” and longingly gaze into each other’s eyes.

But “ho.” To the Tim Donnelly types, “ho” is the ultimate insult. It’s a merging slight of decency, competency, ruggedness, manliness. It’s a word that, in 2018, the Donnelly-esque boobs treat as if we’re living in 1975. Or, as Jay-Z notes in “99 Problems” …

Screen Shot 2018-11-02 at 1.54.01 PM

So, yeah, Tim Donnelly is a little ho.

And here’s the latest Tweet (from earlier today) to prove it.

Screen Shot 2018-11-02 at 1.32.58 PM

I love this Tweet. Like, love, love, love. First because it makes no sense. I mean, I’m pretty sure Andrew Kaczynski is a man. Which means comparing his “hotness” to Ann Coulter makes no sense. But secondly (and I take no pride in saying this), why is it always older white males who look like Donald Trump and Tim Donnelly doing the physical putdowns?

This is Tim Donnelly …

Screen Shot 2018-11-02 at 1.37.57 PM

And this is Andrew Kaczysnki …


I mean … just being honest, were I Tim Donnelly, I wouldn’t go after anyone’s physical appearance.

Wait. I digress.

Tim Donnelly isn’t merely a ho because he compares the “hotness” of men and women, and he isn’t merely a ho because he’s even too insane for Donald Trump.

Nope, he’s a ho because this is what’s listed on his website under REAL RECORD

Screen Shot 2018-11-02 at 1.24.27 PM

Comic. Gold.

For my (limited) money, the top inclusions are “Led the effort to repeal CA’s Forced Vaccination law” (Insane person with zero grasp of medicine or disease), “Tim Donnelly predicted Trump would win” (Psycho psychic), “Tim Donnelly led the statewide effort to repeal the ‘Dream Act’ by traveling the state for 3 months gathering signatures” (Isn’t an accomplishment something that succeeds?), “Most outspoken defender of the 2nd Amendment in California” (Has he polled everyone?), had the CPS Audited after they kidnapped a child because the babies parents wanted a 2nd medical opinion (Um …).

The best of the best of the best, however, has to be: “Endorsed by John Kobylt of the John and Ken Show.”

So I fucking dig this, because it’s the equivalent of having John Oates of the Hall and Oates group play guitar on your album—except having John Oates of the Hall and Oates group appear on your album would actually mean something.

The coveted John Kobylt endorsement is like having Johnny Lozada of the second wave of Menudo appear on your album.

And I love Menudo.

PS: I love that he’s running as a Trump guy, meanwhile Trump—his daddy—doesn’t know he exists. #MAGA

Screen Shot 2018-11-02 at 2.12.56 PM